It's not a NP-hard problem when you restrict the size of the input problem, and so a pseudopolynomial solution works just fine.
You're not answering why it claims the single lasagna adventure yield is 19 on non-Mondays, though.
EatDrink.ash: Optimize your daily diet (and see how your old diet stacks up).
- Thread starter dj_d
- Start date
It's not a NP-hard problem when you restrict the size of the input problem, and so a pseudopolynomial solution works just fine.
You're not answering why it claims the single lasagna adventure yield is 19 on non-Mondays, though.
Theraze
Active member
The most likely thing is that in one of the 5 simulated attempts at varying VoA levels, it chose to use lasagna. At that point, it decided that lasagna would be good for future fake-consumption and gave you (and me) the bad info. I can try to strip that part out, at least... it only affects simulated consumption, though. Unrelated to actual use or non-use of the helper.
Magus_Prime
Well-known member
This morning my simulation run matched the actual but I had to bump VOA to 1700 before EatDrink would consider eating even a single lasagna. At 1650 VOA no lasagnas were considered but at 1700 three were queued.
Last edited:
Magus_Prime
Well-known member
EatDrink used mayo, milk, and a Potion of the Field Gar. Everything looks good. Thank you.
xKiv
Active member
You say that as if I was wrong.
In this case, the problem size *is* very much restricted. Difficulty of the knapsack problem scales linearly with size of knapsack and with number of items. Crude upper bound is on the order of a hundred thousand float comparisons, which is next to nothing in practice.
If anything, any slowdowns in solutions I've seen have been a result of insisting on updating all the mall prices.
Theraze
Active member
Anyways, we've fixed the potential suboptimal suggestion on simulation. There never was a suboptimal selection on actual execution.
Since the lasagna simulation bug is now fixed, if you have a specific new bug that's still occurring, please let us know. If you want to continue discussing knapsack problem solving and its relative merits, please move that outside this thread to the scripting discussion board. Thanks.
Since the lasagna simulation bug is now fixed, if you have a specific new bug that's still occurring, please let us know. If you want to continue discussing knapsack problem solving and its relative merits, please move that outside this thread to the scripting discussion board. Thanks.
The lasagna simulate bug doesn't seem to be fixed:
Further, it's not just a "simulated consumption" bug (as a number of other users reported).
Perhaps it no longer manifested for Magus_Prime because his valueOfAdventure was high enough that lasagna was a reasonable dietary choice in the first place.
Further, it's not just a "simulated consumption" bug (as a number of other users reported).
Perhaps it no longer manifested for Magus_Prime because his valueOfAdventure was high enough that lasagna was a reasonable dietary choice in the first place.
When I ran EatDrink today, I got these error messages:
You need 7 more Bee's Knees to continue.
You need 7 more Sockdollager to continue.
You need 7 more Ish Kabibble to continue.
So it thinks these are good drinks to consume, but it apparently doesn't account for the daily limit of 3 such drinks and then gives up on them entirely.
You need 7 more Bee's Knees to continue.
You need 7 more Sockdollager to continue.
You need 7 more Ish Kabibble to continue.
So it thinks these are good drinks to consume, but it apparently doesn't account for the daily limit of 3 such drinks and then gives up on them entirely.
Crowther
Active member
That was kinda awesome. I woke up, ran my script and $item[Pr0n Chow Mein] caused it to bomb. So I ran svn update and everything was good again. Thanks!You mean like I did in r39 26.5 hours before your post? Someone needs to update their svn copy before they post bug reports...