Well regardless of my opinion, the current state is that both "sofa" and "sofa x" where x <= 0 will now fail silently. I'm restating that for documentation not debate ;-)
Bug - Fixed Cannot use Sofa — r11337 (Sofa command accepts invalid number of turns)
- Thread starter fronobulax
- Start date
I'd been thinking that I preferred "sofa" behaving like "sofa 0", since I didn't want it burning turns if I forgot the argument, but I think precedents argue for it to be like "sofa 1".
- "use X" -> "use 1 X"
- "rest" -> "rest 1"
Just like the "sofa" command, the "rest" command will (usually) use turns to recover HP/MP. The comparison seems exact.
- "use X" -> "use 1 X"
- "rest" -> "rest 1"
Just like the "sofa" command, the "rest" command will (usually) use turns to recover HP/MP. The comparison seems exact.
